In a building over there,
is a camera that absolutely
blows my mind. Is this camera capable
of filming the speed of light? – Yeah.
– Dan: Heck. – Very high tech stuff, guys.
– The maximum speed we can do is 10 trillion
frames per second. This is the reason we came here.
Crank it up all the way? – Yeah.
– All right. I just feel like no human
should ever have seen this. We’ve filmed
the fastest thing. We’ve hit our ceiling. It’s not going to be
anytime soon that we’re going to film
anything faster, so… Not this year, maybe. Should we just invent
some stuff that’s faster? Let’s just start
making up stuff. Yeah, this camera is,
like, 50 trillion– You clearly haven’t seen
super light. It was really interesting,
the set-up. You can tell that so many
thousands of hours of research had gone into creating
that camera. I mean, the footage,
you can’t really tell
what’s happening. When you think about
what’s actually happening, what you’re actually seeing,
it’s more impressive than
the actual footage. Yeah,
it’s one of those things
where the idea of it is way more impressive
than the visual of it. ‘Cause the visual of it
looks like a slightly outdated
film effect. With a picture
of a bottle on it.( synth music playing )I would say of all
the videos we’ve shot, this one,
while we were shooting it, I was struggling to comprehend how the camera was actually
acquiring those images. And also then,
you’ve got to think about
the time scale involved. Like, I can’t get my head around
how short a picosecond is. – It’s absolutely insane.
– Well, nothing else happens
on that sort of scale. Well, as we’re struggling
to wrap our heads around it, we thought it would be best
to actually ask one of the people
who invented the technology. We’re here with Lihong,
who’s one of the inventors
of the camera. Do you think you
could talk us through it,
exactly how it works, and we can try
and understand it, because I just
don’t get it right now. Sure. For the first time,
humans can see how a light pulse
propagates in space. But before
I talk about our camera, let me talk about
the standard streak camera.A standard streak camera
gives you a 1-D movie
that’s really fast.You only allow
the X dimension,
or horizontal dimension,
to pass through,
then you watch a horse race
through a slit.
– It won’t be as fun.
– Right. We’re so used to
your smartphone cameras seeing at least the world
in 2-D, if not 3-D. Yeah, it’s a world
you can relate to. Exactly.
And so let me talk about
how our camera works.Let’s say we start
with this object.
But before we send it
to a standard streak camera,
we’re going to route itto this digital
micromirror device.
We write this code,
and that’s an important step,
because that allows us
later on to decode everything
to generate a 2-D movie.And this encoded objectis routed
to this streak camera
Unlike the standard use
of the streak camera,
we allow the wide dimension,or the vertical dimension
to come in.
At the back end,
you can use a slower camera
to capture whatever
you want to detect.
It’s a great invention.This technology allows usto look at really short
time intervals.
Why do we have to
use a laser instead of just
a normal light bulb
or a flashlight? A flashlight
turns on too slowly
for us to observe. A laser,
we can make it really short. So we use a state of the art
laser pulse, and that turns on within
a femtosecond scale. So, the laser pulse
is on the femto scale? Right, right. Yeah.
But our camera works so fast… – Yeah, I was going to say.
– …even nanoseconds
feels like eternity. This camera makes it look
like the light’s just
hanging out forever,but it’s really still
on the pico scale.
Lihong:Right,
you’re literally watching
the slowest slow motion
movies right now.
The hope is that our camera
can be used to study
some fundamental physics. We’ve all heard of sonar,
but there’s an optical counterpart of sonar
called lidar. Very much like radar, as well. You basically detect
a round trip time. So, from the time,
you can measure distance. Could that be used
to see around corners? Yes, it is feasible,
although we haven’t
done that physically. – That’s like a superpower.
– Yeah. For now, we’re doing something
very similar to that. Let’s say you have
a foggy situation
or a cloudy situation.To your naked eye,you would not see
the airplane at all.
So we can just
see through the cloud
and get a movie like this.You can see
this little airplane. Gav:And I’m seeing
you can also see
the depth information
this way, as well.
Lihong:
You get depth information.
This would be actually much
more accurate than our eye.
And this could be useful, even maybe in the future
for autonomous cars. We want to drive
in a cloudy situation– a foggy situation, and you can see objects
through the fog. – Another superpower.
– Yeah. We’re also thinking about
something more biological. We know that our brain
is the most complex machine
probably in the universe. I want to figure out
how our brain computes
one plus one, even. By using our camera,
we can potentially see that. Would this be useful
for detecting damage
in the brain? Like, if someone’s
had a stroke, would you be able
to see that on this? That’s certainly our hope. Does that mean
that in the future, people will be able
to read my mind? That’s one possibility. I just feel like
it must feel like
such an accomplishment to have seen
the fastest thing. It was a surreal moment
when we got the first movie
at light speed. Because that’s
the ceiling as we know it. We never thought
it would be possible, yes. Well, thank you very much,
Lihong, for teaching us
all this fascinating stuff. I’m going to be thinking
about this on the way home. I’m going to be watching this
and trying to understand it. – Several times.
– All right, back to you,
Gav and Dan. Thanks, us. This is our
time cheat sheet, just a list of all
the different time scales. We usually hang around
milliseconds. A lot of our exposures
are down to the microsecond. – Yeah.
– Sometimes when
we’re using the 2511, we’ll have exposure times
that are pushing on
the hundredths of nanoseconds, but that’s about as far
as our Phantoms go. – Yeah.
– We were down here
with this camera and around
in this ballpark. But before, right,
I kind of had it
all comprehended. I had it all in my mind,
like, “Yeah, this is
the amount of time.” – Now I’ve lost it again.
– Well, what– – That many zeroes?
– What blows my mind is we had
femtosecond long
piece of light – going all around…
– Yeah, we did. …filming it with
picosecond differences
between frames. What on Earth
is all this about? Yoctosecond? Surely, that would make
the light look like
you blinking.At this point,
I feel like you might
as well just say infinity.We’ve actually
had a lot of comments over
the years of doing this asking us to film light
with our Phantom. Like, film a torch
or a laser beam or a light bulb
or something. And I always
have to explain to them, light is so fast
that our Phantom camera sees light
the exact same way
as our eyes do. So just for the hell of it, thought I’d
demonstrate it here. Here’s the light.
Here’s a piece of paper. Let’s play it.Boop. All right.
There it is, instantly on.
I just dropped that to prove
that it was in slow-mo.
Because otherwise–
– Dan:They wouldn’t believe us.Gav:They wouldn’t
believe us otherwise.
I thought a good way
to demonstrate just how fast 100 billion plus
frames a second is, we could just look
at some of our old footage and determine how long
it would have taken at 100 billion
frames a second, or 10 trillion. All right, let me
pull something up.Lightning strike.One of the fastest things we’ve ever filmed previously before we immediately
beat it. If we were to film this at
100 billion frames a second. to watch the whole clip
played back at 24 would take almost
four months. – Four months?
– Yeah. And it’s just
happening right there. Gav:
And there it is.
And if somehow we were ableto film this at
10 trillion frames a second, the whole strike
from beginning to end would take 32 years. Imagine the length
of that storm. I can actually
simulate exactly what
that would look like if filmed at 10 trillion. Here we go,
and it’s playing now. That’s exactly
what it would look like. – Flippin’-A.
– All right, another clip? No, no.
Watch the whole thing. Okay. – 32 years.
– That should take us
into retirement. Yeah, I think so. ( no audible dialogue ) Next clip.
Remember this bad lad? Dan:
I do. Sherman round.
Gav:We filmed this
at 12,000 frames a second.
There it is
hurtling through the air.
If we’d have filmed thisat 100 billion frames
a second,
from the muzzle
to when it goes out of the end of frame
would take eight years. Well, that would
kind of defeat the object of having a tank
firing at something. They’d just be, like, “I guess I’ll move
out of the way.” You could serve
two presidential terms before it went out of frame.Now just for giggles,it’s pretty easy math–you just add two zeroes.If we filmed it
at 10 trillion, 800 years from
beginning to end. So, like, quite a few
Queen Elizabeths. And finally,
the human blink–
specifically, yours. You can tell it’s mine
because of the rogue brow. – Gav:Look at that.
Yeah.Gav:Filmed at
1,000 frames a second,
if shot at 100 billion,
it would take 19 yearsfor you to close
and open your eyes.
( Dan gasps )Gav:The things that you
wouldn’t have seen.
It would be like
I’d be just about to celebrate the millennium,
and then I’d be like, “Whoa!” “3, 2, 1! 2019?” You blinked
and missed the millennium.And absurdly,
if we filmed this
at 10 trillion frames
a second,
the most boring video ever, it would take 1,900 years for you to open
your eyes again. So, I’d just start blinking when Jesus was cutting around. I’d open them up
and it would be World War I. – Pretty much.
– Right. That’s a great way
of imagining that. And just think,
in all that time, a few photons of light
would just be like, “Ah, there we go,”
like it was nothing. That was honestly
an absurd episode. To take something that–
you know, everyday time,
we’re used to it, but to take it
to that extreme level, you could barely
even get your head around.
I quite liked it. I liked how much
it messed with my head. Me, too.
I quite liked how
they were telling us about the real world
applications it could be used for
in the future, like the police
might want to use it to see around corners
with that lidar. Like the sonar where
they fire light out and bounces off
all the surfaces and they see people
around the corner. Yeah, or easily being able to see through skin
with one picture. Yeah, you can see
how a wound is healing or you can basically take
a MRI with your cell phone. It makes me
slightly terrified about the future
of surveillance technology, but, you know,
we’ll see what happens. Hopefully,
you enjoyed that video. Make sure you check out
other episodes from “Planet Slow Mo.” and you can subscribe to us, the Slow Mo Guys,
if you want. The episodes aren’t usually
that heavy, I promise. Those guys were so smart
and they wore lab coats. I feel like
I should just be, like– – We should take ours off.
– Just take it.

Tagged : # # # # # # # #

Dennis Veasley

90 thoughts on “How do you film the Speed of Light?”

  1. مستحيل لان سرعة الضوء هي اسرع من الزمن يعني يجب ان يكون التققاط الكمرة للقطة اسرع من الضوء وهذا مستحيل لان السرعة لها حد ومستحيل من المستحيلات السبعة ان يخترق الحد للسرعة ويفوت سرعة توقف الزمن

  2. the stupid GAV like a spoiled child prevented the scientist to complete his sentence on brain. both of them kept repeating super power like a robot. spoiled the video for me. I wanted to see mainly the traveling light to deduce if they have videoed the light or scattered light from particle in light path? Ferydoon Shirazi. MG1

  3. I’d like to see a nuclear device detonated with this camera. We could learn a lot.
    The nuclear reaction is at the speed of light so you’d think part of it would disappear.

  4. he invented nothing at all polarizer exist since 1926
    laser aren't used because they are faster they have all the same speed it is light after all
    laser are the only light source with a directed wavelength thats why

    and overall ist youst an simulation calculated on the pc and not a working camera

    BIG BUALLSHIT

  5. with is tech you could put together a real high class misses laser defense as long as you have the computer speed to match. it can be use for a lot of good besides that. good break through

  6. Британские учОные и не то еще могут,едрена вошь!

  7. This is bacially bulshit you can never fill the speed of linght .cause you ate getting the informantion in light so you are telling light is slower than light.This 9000iq problen only 2 or3 people can understand what i am telling but trust ne it makes sense.

  8. If light was a conscious living thing, it would not even care for humans or life as we know it, simply because we take so long to come into existence that it wouldnt even notice us, what does that tell you about the other realms of possibilities in the universe… and here we are fighting over something called RELIGION.
    I love how science puts things into perspective, the physical makeup of the universe, and we as humans actually know nothing on a cosmic scale of things.
    Very humbling.

  9. Referencing a lightning strike is a misnomer. Essentially a lie, because the lightning traversing the sky does not travel at the speed of light and the visual aspect of the discharge is even slower as it is also transforming the electrostatic energy into energy in the form of light and at that point traveling to the receiver's eye. Then consider the cases where it's a cascading discharge and the speed is further reduced. So viewing a lightning strike in slow motion is actually capturing the effect associated with the discharge. Still beautiful but not the same as measuring light traveling between two points. Just my 2c

  10. FYI – Long ago I saw something even more amazing in a Ted Talk (2012) — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_9vd4HWlVA (or search Youtube for 'Imaging at a trillion frames per second | Ramesh Raskar')

  11. The trick (and this is a trick)… a series of images are collected from a series of laser light pulses, each collected bit later after leaving the laser — sorta like assembling a movie by taking a series of single-frame pictures of the Staten Island Ferry once a day where each photo in the sequence is recorded a bit further into its voyage than the day before. With this process, as long as you sync the time up the time later for each frame, and capture an event that is repeating precisely, you can replicate what looks like a high-speed video rate. But you cannot capture a one-time event this way, and the system is not a true 'high-speed' camera.

  12. Is the color changing of the plane image because of the Doppler Effect? As it is moving toward the center of the frame it is on the blue side of the spectrum, and as it is moving away it turns red.

  13. Wait a minute. How can a DIGITAL camera record in the Phz range when the COMPUTER that it runs on and computes the image with can only operate in the Ghz range? I call BS on the 10 trillion frames per second claim. Most likely the image that produces is just a simulation rather than the recording itself.

  14. What about sound?
    Which technology do you use for slowing sound? I heard a worse theme in your videos. I want to hear the video itself.
    And most important question: Why does sound frequency change when it is slowed but light frequency does not?

  15. need to get a smoke machine and try turning on that flashlight (torch) again – so we can see the lightbeam slowly crossing the screen of course 🙂

  16. انا ثاانوي عاام 2020 علمي ريااضه ونفسي ادخل هندسه حاسبات ومعلومات 💙✌
    ادعولي اجيب فووق 97℅ وربنا يكرمكم 💙✌ لان دعوه ٤٠ غريب مستجابه
    واعلم انك ان وقفت بجانب اخاك وقف الله بجانبك ولو بعد حين 💙😍
    ١لايك = دعوه 😍💙

  17. 🇺🇸✝️🇬🇧hey from Surprise,Arizona🤠🐕🍿🍿…just finished both parts of this episode….and you guys have a new sub…Great great stuff….keep the good stuff coming!!……🇬🇧✝️🇺🇸

  18. I've been hoping for this level of technology for the last twenty years. Your science is as good as your equipment to test it.

  19. The bullet is reminiscent of the Matrix. It begs the question, what if you could exist everywhere, would time cease from your perspective?

  20. Okay now pay close attention to Mr Hong. Notice there is no "film" in his camera. Therefore there can be no "footage" either. I really thought you guys would have figured this out long ago. "Filming a video?" You're gonna have to make up your mind. These are two different methods of capturing an image.

  21. Oh so this camera is different from the camera which pulsates light and it take a pictures at different moments during the pulse…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *